|
Regarding a daughter of such persons, opinion in the
Mishnah is divided as to whether or not it was necessary
that one of the parents should be of Jewish descent. The
decision of later authorities was that, in case both of
the woman's parents were proselytes or freed persons, a
priest should not marry her, but if he had done so, then
the marriage should be considered legitimate.
A Kohen not complying with these requirements is not
allowed to give the priestly blessing.
Talmudic law prescribes that the honor of being first
called upon for the reading of the Torah should belong
to the priest.
According to the Talmud, the regulations demanding an
unimpeachable pedigree continued to be binding, even
after the Temple had been destroyed. The reason is that
eventually the Jewish Messiah will arrive, gather the
Jews back to the land of Israel, rebuild the Temple, and
resume the priestly service; at such a time Kohanim of
unimpeachable status will be required for such service.
Rules protecting against ritual defilement
Even in death, many Kohanim choose to have this symbol,
the position of their fingers and hands during the
priestly blessing, placed as a crest or symbol on their
gravestones, to indicate their status.The Kohanim formed
a holy order. For the purpose of protecting them against
all ritual profanation and defilement they were to
follow many rules.
- Kohanim were
forbidden to come in contact with dead bodies, except
in the case of their nearest kin, nor were they
permitted to perform the customary mourning rites. A
Kohen is forbidden to enter any house or enclosure, or
approach any spot, where a dead body, or part of a
dead body, may be found. (Lev. x. 6, xxi. 1–5; Ezek.
xliv. 20, 25).
- A Kohen is forbidden
to touch any one or anything that is ritually unclean
through contact with the dead.
- They were not
allowed to marry harlots, nor dishonored or divorced
women (Lev. xxi. 7).T
- They were required
to abstain from wine and all strong drink while
performing sacerdotal duties (Lev. x. 9; Ezek. xliv.
21).
- Any priest having
incurred Levitical defilement was excluded, under
penalty of death, from priestly service and from
partaking of holy food during the time of his
uncleanness (Lev. xxii. 2–7, 9; Ezek. xliv. 26 et
seq.).
- If afflicted with
any bodily blemish the priest was held permanently
unfit for service; however, they were still permitted
to eat of the holy food (Lev. xxi. 17–23). The Talmud
specifies what constitutes a bodily defect sufficient
to render a Kohen unfit for priestly service.
Exceptions to rules for contact with the dead
In
contradistinction to Lev. 21:2–4, the Talmud includes a
Kohen's wife and children among the persons of immediate
relationship. Thus, it specifies that a Kohen must take
care of and bury his dead wife and children, even though
a strict reading of the Torah would mean that this
renders the Kohen ritually impure.
The Talmud prescribes that if any Kohen, even the Kohen
Gadol (high priest), finds a corpse by the wayside, and
there is no one else in the area who can be called upon
to inter it, then the Kohen himself must perform the
burial.
The Talmud orders the Kohen to defile himself in the
case of the death of a nasi (rabbinic leader of a
religious academy). The Talmud relates that when Judah
haNasi died the priestly laws concerning defilement
through contact with the dead were suspended for the day
of his death.
Division into work groups
Not all
Kohanim (priests) worked at the same time; they were
divided into twenty-four groups. This is mentioned in
Chronicles; this practice continued down to the
destruction of the Second Temple, as statements to this
effect by Josephus ("Ant." vii. 14, § 7; "Vita", § 1)
and the Talmudic sources show.
These "divisions" of priests took turns in weekly
service. Those who served changed every Shabbat
(Sabbath), but on the Biblical festivals all twenty-four
were present in the Temple.
These twenty-four "divisions" were subdivided into from
five to nine smaller groups. Each of these smaller
groups was assigned to service in turn. The main
"divisions" were called mishmarot, the "subdivisions"
batte abot (terms which in Chronicles are used
interchangeably). There was a chief at the head of each
main "division", and also one at the head of each
"subdivision".
Post-Temple theology and practice
After the
destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem the formal
role of priests in sacrificial services came to an end,
since in the absence of a temple in Jerusalem,
sacrifices are not brought.
Women and the priesthood
A Bat
Kohen is the daughter of a Kohen. The Talmud states that
she loses her status as a Kohenet (i.e. "female Kohen")
when she marries a non-Kohen. Some rulings in
traditional Jewish law allow for the ruling that a Bat
Kohen may perform the ritual of pidyon ha-ben, the
ceremonial redemption of a first-born son. In practice
Orthodox Judaism views this as forbidden. A Bat Kohen
may not perform the ritual of Nesiat Kapayim, the
priestly blessing sung aloud from the pulpit towards the
congregation.
Marriages involving Kohanim
Historic and present-day Orthodox Judaism view
Such marriages are regulated by a number of special
restrictions in addition to the general laws covering
all Israelites. The Torah prohibits a Kohen from
marrying women of certain specified categories: A
divorcee, a "defiled" woman, or a "harlot". It ordains
that any Kohen who makes such a marriage loses his
priestly status [Lev. 21:6–7]. The Talmudic
understanding of the word "harlot" also encompasses the
meaning "proselyte" (or "convert"). According to the
Talmud the act of marriage, although prohibited, was
effective if a Kohen married in disregard of the
prohibitions. Any children born of the union are
legitimate.
Since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, there
have been no more sacrificial services, but the
sanctified status of the Kohanim remains in force.
Reform view
Reform
Judaism sees ritual halakha as no longer having any
legal status, and this allows such marriages. Orthodox
Judaism accepts that these laws are still normative, and
thus usually forbids such marriages.
Conservative Judaism view
Conservative Judaism holds that, in general, Jewish law
is still binding, but that these particular restrictions
are no longer applicable. Thus the movement teaches that
a Kohen may marry a convert or divorcee. Their reasoning
is that:
The Temple in Jerusalem is no longer extant; Kohanim are
no longer needed to perform Temple services.
According
to many codes of Jewish law, the priestly status of most
Kohanim is doubtful, at best. Rabbi Isaac ben Sheshet
(14th century) differentiates between authentic Kohanim
of ancient times, and those who carry the title today.
He rules that today's Kohanim, lacking documentary
evidence of clear right to the priestly title, owes any
privileges and obligations not simply to halakha (law)
but rather to the force of minhag (custom). [Sefer Bar
Sheshet, responsum 94, Lemberg, 1805].
Rabbi Solomon Luria (16th century) rules that because of
the frequent persecutions and expulsions of Jews
throughout history, Kohanim lost track of their
genealogy. The Magen Avraham also rules this way, and
Rabbi Jacob Emden ruled similarly.
The intermarriage crisis in American Judaism is an
extreme situation, and the movement feels it must
support the decision of two Jews to marry.
See also the entry on the Jewish view of marriage
Kohanim in contemporary times
Orthodox Jewish views
Since the
end of the Temple in Jerusalem, the Kohen has little
formal rule in Jewish life. The one area in which the
Kohen still has a formal and public ceremonial comes in
the area of the aliyah, the ritual reading of the Torah
during prayer services. Three times each week a portion
from the Torah is read aloud in front of the
congregation, in the original Hebrew, and this reading
is split into a number of portions. It is customary to
reserve the first reading of the Torah for a Kohen, and
the second reading of the Torah for a Levite. In the
Orthodox Jewish community this custom has the effective
status of law.
As Orthodox Judaism does not allow women to read
publicly from the Torah during formal prayer services,
daughters of Kohanim and Leviyim have no role in this
area.
In regards to the ritual of pidyon ha-ben, the symbolic
redemption of a newborn son, Orthodox rabbis note that
there are some rabbinic sources which allow women to
perform this ritual. In practice, however, the custom is
to use only men.
In regards to the ritual of the Priestly Blessing, a Bat
Kohen (daughter of a Kohen) is not permitted to
participate in Nesiat Kapayim because as a continuation
of a Temple ritual, the Priestly Benediction should be
performed by those who were authentically eligible to do
so in the Temple.
Conservative and Masorti Jewish views
The aliyah
is the ritual reading of the Torah during prayer
services. It is customary to reserve the first reading
of the Torah for a Kohen, and the second reading of the
Torah for a Levite. In the Conservative Jewish community
this custom is generally followed, but it does not have
the status of law. The Rabbinical Assembly's Committee
on Jewish Law and Standards has ruled that a rabbi is
not obligated to follow this custom. As such, in some
Conservative and synagogues, this custom is not
followed.
The following are the opinions of the Committee of
Jewish Law and Standards (CJLS) of the Rabbinical
Assembly, the international body of Conservative Jewish
rabbis. Note that the Conservative movement teaches that
where the law committee has validated more than one
possible position, a congregation must follow the ruling
of its rabbi, who as mara d'atra, local authority, has
the sole responsibility in making such a p'sak, decision
of Jewish law.
One position of the CJLS is that daughters of Kohanim
and Leviyim can be accorded the same honor of reading
publicly from the Torah that are normally accorded to
Kohanim and Leviyim, whether they are single or married.
Their status regarding being called to the Torah should
not be determined by the lineage of their husbands, but
by their own paternal lineage (Rabbi Joel Roth "The
status of daughters of Kohanim and Leviyim for aliyot"
11/15/89). Another position is that women do not receive
such aliyot. The law committee of the Masorti movement
(Conservative Judaism in Israel) has also ruled that
women do not receive such aliyot (Rabbi Robert Harris,
5748).
In regards to the ritual of pidyon ha-ben, the symbolic
redemption of a newborn son, women may perform it on a
newborn son. However, it is forbidden to perform this
ceremony on a new-born daughter.
In regards
to the ritual of the Priestly Blessing, the CJLS has
approved two positions. One view holds that a Bat Kohen
may participate in Nesiat Kapayim, another view holds
that a Bat Kohen is not permitted to participate in
Nesiat Kapayim because as a continuation of a Temple
ritual, the Priestly Benediction should be performed by
those who were authentically eligible to do so in the
Temple. (Rabbis Stanley Bramnick and Judah Kagen, 1994;
and a responsa by the Va'ad halakha of the Masorti
movement, Rabbi Reuven Hammer, 5748)
Reform and Reconstructionist Jewish views
The
majority of Reform Jews and Reconstructionist Jews
consider all rules and ceremonies regarding the
priesthood to be outdated. Many consider it to be
anti-egalitarian, and thus discriminatory against Jews
who are not Kohanim. Thus the above laws and customs are
no longer observed in Reform or Reconstructionist Jewish
communities. Many Reform and Reconstructionist Temples
effectively forbid the practice of these laws and
customs. Both Orthodox and Conservative Jews strenuously
disagree with this latter view.
Who is a Priest?
King
Melchizedek of Salem, identified by Rashi as being Shem
the son of Noah by another name, is the first person in
the Torah to be called a Kohen (Genesis 14:18).
When Esau sold the birthright of the first born to
Jacob, Rashi explains that the Priesthood was sold along
with it, because by right the priesthood belongs to the
first born. Only when the firstborn (along with the rest
of Israel) sinned at the Golden calf, the priesthood was
given to the tribe of Levi, which had not been tainted
by this incident.
Moses was supposed to receive the priesthood along with
the leadership of the Jewish people, but when he argued
with God that he should not be the leader, it was given
to Aaron.
Aaron received the priesthood along with his children
and any descendents that would be born subsequently.
However, his grandson Pinchas (Phineas) had already been
born, and did not receive the priesthood until he killed
the prince of the tribe of Simon and the princess of the
Midianites (Numbers 31:11–12).
Thereafter, the priesthood has remained with the
descendants of Aaron. However, when the Messiah comes,
there is a tradition that it will revert back to the
first born.
Recent genetic findings: The Kohen gene
Recently
the tradition that Kohanim are actually descended from
Aaron was supported by genetic testing (Skorecki et al.,
1997). Since all direct male lineage shares a common Y
chromosome, testing was done across sectors of the
Jewish population to see if there was any commonality
between their Y chromosomes. There was proven to be
certain distinctions among the "Kohen" Y chromosomes,
implying that the Kohanim do share some common ancestry.
This information was used to support the claim of the
Lemba (a sub-Saharan tribe) that they were in fact, a
tribe of Jews. See also Y-chromosomal Aaron.
Cohen as a surname
Many
Kohanim have a surname that reflects their status, such
as Cohen itself, Conn or "Anglicised" variants like
Conway. Cogan may be due to a confusion between the h
and g sounds in parts of Eastern Europe, or a corruption
of Kagan. Katz may be short for Kohen Tzedek (Righteous
Kohen). However, by no means all Jews with such surnames
are Kohanim. Also, some Cohens may be Irish (corruption
of Cohan).
Trivia
The
gesture that a Kohen gives when blessing a congregation
was Leonard Nimoy's inspiration for the Vulcan salute.
|