Parashas Yisro
"Yisro, the minister of Midian, the father-in-law of
Moshe, heard everything that God did to Moshe and Yisrael
His people" (Shemos 18:1). And Yisro took Tzipporah and her
sons and went to meet Moshe in the desert. Then, "Moshe told
his father-in-law everything that Hashem had done" (18:8).
The question arises, if Yisro had already heard, why did
Moshe have to tell him again? And why only after Yisro
speaks to Moshe does he say, "Now I know that Hashem is
greater than all the Gods" (18:11)? Then he goes to offer a
sacrifice. Why did he wait?
I believe that Yisro acted wisely. Although he had heard
of the miracles that were performed for the people, he
hadn't heard about them firsthand. Only after he heard
everything from Moshe's lips could he believe that he heard
the whole truth, and then He could praise God and offer
sacrifices.
How often do we hear stories which at their core might be
true but have gone through some alteration, exaggeration,
addition, subtraction, etc.? We need to verify the facts of
any story we hear at its source before we react, even
positively. If you hear that someone is expecting a baby and
you go to congratulate her, or that someone got engaged, or
has a new job, and it turns out you were wrong, it could
turn your congratulations into ona'as devarim (words that
inflict pain). It goes without saying that we shouldn't
believe anything negative.
You shall not bear false witness against your fellow. (Shemos
20:13)
A false witness isn't necessarily someone who lies
deliberately. It could just be someone who thinks he knows
the story but didn't verify it in enough depth. He passes on
his version of the events without finding out the facts
firsthand. According to Sforno, this commandment prohibits
gossip and slander as well as bearing false witness. The
Sages apply it to prohibit testimony even in cases where a
witness is convinced that something took place but did not
actually witness it himself. For example, if someone's
scrupulously honest teachers or friends told him about
something, he may not claim to be a witness to it (Shavuos
31a).
If Yisro could travel such a long way to speak to Moshe
and verify the facts before he did something positive like
praise Hashem, we too can at least pick up the phone and
check that what we heard in fact happened the way we heard
it. Then we won't spread lashon hara, which, for the most
part, is also bearing false witness.